Mintzberg- Organizational structure
Mintzberg
Simple organizational
structures have characteristic of low degree of differentiation of subtasks and
the leaders have wide variety of control. The authority is highly centralized
in hand of single person. Sometime the simple organization is also known as,
“Flat Structure”. This type of structure has only 2-3 vertical level and worker
who can perform different kind of works. William
Hewlett and David Packard began their business in a garage, and in starting they
follow simple organisational structure. Start up generally follows this type of
structure.
For routine or repetitive work, Machine
Bureaucracy is the best model for the organisation. A key challenge is how to
motivate and satisfy the workers in the operating core and repetitive work. For
example, company like McDonalds adopt this model to manufacturer Hamburger. Mc
Donald’s company give stress on consistency and uniformity of the repetitive
work.
Mature company generally follow the
professional bureaucracy structure. In professional bureaucracy, control relies
heavily on professional training and indoctrination. Professionals are
insulated from formal interference, feeling them free to apply their expertise.
Bad part of this system is that professional bureaucracy responds slowly to
external changes.
Divisional form of organization structure
is most common form and generally use in company of US, dividing on the basis
of work like production, finance, marketing and human resources. Divisional
structure offers economies of scale, resources and responsiveness while
controlling economic risk. It also creates some problem like Cat and Mouse game
between division and Headquarter.
Headquarters wants oversight, while divisional
managers try to evade corporate control. Example of this form of structure is
one of olden business house of US that is Berwind Corporation.
Adhocracy form of structure works well in
smaller forms of organization.
Adhocracy is a loose, flexible, self-renewing
organic form tied together. Inconsistencies and contradictions in an adhocracy
become paradoxes where a balance between opposites protects an organization
from falling into an either-or trap. Examples are advertising agencies,
think-tank consulting firms, and the recording industry.
References
Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy
concept 1: five p's for strategy. U. of California.
Mintzberg, H. (1991). The effective
organization: forces and forms. Sloan Management Review, 54.
Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5's: A
Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design. Management science, 26(3),
322-341.
Comments