Is Gandhi Ji Still Significant?

Is Gandhi Ji Still Significant?

On this particular day, a boy was born in a middle-class Gujarati family, 140 years ago, who had to prepare their own paths and theories to redeem themselves as a man, to lead a nation and free their mind from the slavery. The secret of the power came from his faith in truth, which he collected from the study of different religions, civilizations, and the concept of humanity. It is clearly described in his favorite devotional song 'Vaishnava Jan ......' (The true man of God is one who can sympathize with the pain of others). Of course, obstacles of class, color, and religion were in vain if someone respected a concept of humanity.

वैष्णव जन तो तेने कहिये, जे पीड परायी जाणे रे।

पर दुःखे उपकार करे तो ये, मन अभिमान न आणे रे॥

वैष्णव जन तो तेने कहिये...

 For Gandhi, the man can win the war only when he can control the inner mind. As a practitioner of Truth, who distributed his experiences and trained a batch of learned people like Nehru, Patel, Maulana Azad, Gaffar Khan, and others - to learn this unique discovery of strengthening themselves to become the winner. He rose to the level of ‘saint’ or 'Mahatma', through his simple lifestyle, once Churchill mocked him by saying “Naked Fakir (Hermit) because he cannot recognize the simplicity of ‘Mahatama’. At last, he died due to bullet shit arises from the co0mmunal tension for which he fights till the last breath. 

The partition between India and Pakistan was followed by the large level of bloodshed which was quite opposite to the teaching of Gandhi Ji of Non-Violence. The worst thing is that they realized that a person, a lifetime, was not enough to teach the blessings of 'non-violence' on any religion, ritual or religion. Did the man fail?, Was he the failure of his faith, or his God? Or was it a mistake for those good people to think that 'tooth for the tooth' was unable to think beyond. In fact, one of the works of Gandhian non-violence is an attempt to break limited conservative and irreversible categories for human communication. Each modern thinker has one audience and one constituency. The issue is whether the viewer is satisfied and justified or should it been challenged and therefore has been directed in a more democratic partnership in the society

The moral and political principles of Mahatma Gandhi do not constitute a real gearbox, which runs our thoughts and actions in one direction, and is operated by a spiritual engine in which only one monolithic ideology is in the form of fuel source. Gandhi had the courage to stand up and speak on the authority of the tradition, to be consistent with his beliefs, but at the same time, being free enough to change his mind, discover new things and whatever he kept once again Go find him again. 

Infographic justifying the point

I think Gandhi's saying would be the worst distortion that he was close to any of these political philosophers. Similarly, Gandhi is not related to any of the three ideological choices that are available to us today. One option is to return to "religious dogmatism". The second option is "Relativity", which has been given an example by the modernist movement, which believes that the objective truth should be replaced by the Hermetic Truth. The third option is "rational fundamentalism" which believes in the total power of reasoning and desacralizes and disenchants, everything is real. I think Gandhi is not currently impressed by any of these three main scenes. He is not a religious fanatic. He is not a cultural revivalist, and he is not committed to the idea of absolute reason. What I find interesting in Gandhi is on the matter that he kept a place for doubt and suspicious irony (and even self-paranoid) in his mind. From the general to the saint, Gandhi's elevation came in different stages. After qualifying as a barrister and settling in South Africa, in reference to his fight for the equality of the race, his first trend was legal. He knew his mind and his beliefs were his main strength. He had the ability to humiliate and oppress his concept of spirituality, suffers enough time to change the opponent's mentality from rivalry to embarrassment.

The tactics changed with apathy from the aggressive campaigns of rulers, because they worked hard to pedal. 'Citizen Disobedience', 'Swadeshi' came in - a team to reduce the rulers of revenue. 'Dandi March' Separating an illegal 'salt tax', and finally, in '42, when England was drowning in a war of war, it bounced for 'knock-out' by declaring 'Quit India Movement'. The British had no option other than to call them to negotiate for the promise of independence, but there was a demand of cooperation till winning the war. Did Gandhi leave important penalties in this phase? Because later, conversation freedom gave enough space to fight for leadership and incited communal tensions.  

Weakening England and its allies were to go against its philosophy of universal human equality, giving Nazism a chance. By then there was another well-defined vision that he had developed. It was their wish that if the British were to be left, we should take part in the form of 'Friends'. This last person is the last and relevant message for our time. Violence, destruction, suffering cannot be prevented. War can be for greed, shelter, or revenge. If that is not preventable, the knowledge of the last message applies. 'It's time to get into the air, and when you are still in a' run as friends', even then bloodshed and painful, finally 'division' partition.

In the first decade of the 20th century, he landed the Indian soil. His strategy was already successful in South Africa, and he knew the No Violence is the tested path to unite India once again. He educated himself in social stigma in society, rural economy, and common man's thinking. These were the components of the 'non-violence' of their army. He studied with the great instability of microeconomics at the village cottage level. Economics and self-reliance were essential to lead a winning campaign. It made them the greatest marketers of all time. Trademarks 'Khadi' is still the dress code of Indian politician, sans propaganda, sans propaganda - what Kotler would say in terms of high vision, as easy as marketing. He was quite clear about the economy's qualities and self-reliance in fighting any national aggression.

My tribute to Mahatma on 2nd October

                                                       Credit-giphy.com

   Regards,

Bankim Chandra Pandey
pandey.bankim@gmail.com
www.bankimpandey.ooo

Disclaimer- The topic review describes the general perception of the author and it is not written to hurt the sentiments of any group. The information present in the blog is sourced from the credible source but the author does not guarantee for 100 percent correctness. The GIF used and images use is under "Fair use policy".